Senate votes to remove US forces from conflict with Iran
It is the first time the chamber has passed a measure aimed at limiting President Donald Trump’s war powers
The US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran.
The Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. The resolution passed the House by a vote of 215-208 earlier this month.
According to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy.
The vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East. Previous efforts, including one last week, failed to win sufficient support.
“Congress never authorized this failed war, and the president certainly has no authority to continue it indefinitely without our consent, as the Constitution requires,” Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said after the resolution passed.
A White House official dismissed the vote, telling CNN that the resolution “has no significance” because it “has no force of law” and is not subject to presidential approval.
Trump denounced the resolution as “poorly timed and meaningless.”
“These Senators have just made my job more difficult, but I will get it done, one way or the other, because I always get it done!” the president wrote on Truth Social.
The resolution was passed as US and Iranian negotiators continued discussions on implementing the memorandum of understanding signed by the two sides on June 17. Some of Trump’s most vocal supporters, including hawkish Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, have expressed concern that the agreement could grant significant concessions to Iran.
“If you don’t have a diplomatic path through the MOU, then you have to go to war, or some other form of coercion,” Graham told CBS last week.
The conflict began on February 28, when the US and Israel launched a bombing campaign in Iran. The Islamic Republic responded by firing missiles and drones at Arab states in the region that host American military bases. Iran also closed the Strait of Hormuz to most shipping, driving up oil prices.
Despite the relentless strikes, US intelligence assessments cited by media outlets indicate that Iran has retained around 70% of its prewar missile stockpile. Trump has continued to threaten renewed military action in recent days, although members of his administration have described the ongoing talks as constructive.
The war has remained widely unpopular, with only 24% of Americans saying it was worth the cost, and just 23% believing the US is in a stronger position now than it was before the fighting, according to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll.
15 thoughts on “Senate votes to remove US forces from conflict with Iran”
The detail about according to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy is something people should sit with.
Think about it: the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran. That speaks volumes.
Reading that the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure — hard to argue with the logic there.
In other words the vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East. Curious to see how this develops.
Reading that the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran — hard to argue with the logic there.
Considering the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
Think about it: according to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy. That speaks volumes.
If the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
When you look at the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure, the implications are hard to ignore.
The bigger issue here is the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. That changes the calculation.
If the vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
If the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
On one hand according to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy. But at the same time the vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East.
In other words the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran. Curious to see how this develops.
The detail about according to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy is something people should sit with.
Think about it: the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran. That speaks volumes.
Reading that the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure — hard to argue with the logic there.
In other words the vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East. Curious to see how this develops.
Reading that the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran — hard to argue with the logic there.
Considering the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
Think about it: according to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy. That speaks volumes.
If the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
When you look at the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure, the implications are hard to ignore.
The bigger issue here is the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. That changes the calculation.
So the bottom line is the Senate voted 50-48 on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. Wonder how this will land.
If the vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
If the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
On one hand according to AP, the resolution is largely symbolic but reflects growing opposition to the president’s Iran policy. But at the same time the vote marked the tenth attempt by Democrats to compel Trump to end US involvement in hostilities in the Middle East.
In other words the US Senate has, for the first time, passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to withdraw American forces from hostilities involving Iran. Curious to see how this develops.