Anatomy of a speech: how does a Republican leader say no to Trump?
South Carolina’s state senate majority leader offered a nuanced case for rejecting Trump’s redistricting demands
How does a Republican leader say no to Donald Trump? How do they criticize the US president’s policies without facing a social media riot, or losing their career?
As the party scrambles to redraw key congressional districts after the supreme court effectively gutted a major section of the Voting Rights Act that prevented racial discrimination, all eyes turned this week to South Carolina.
I had never had the privilege of speaking with the president of the United States until last week. And it really was – it was a privilege. I enjoyed the conversation. It was a very good conversation. He gave me more time in a phone call than I could have expected…
The president told me, he said: “Look, I hope you can help us out.” He said: “But I understand you got to do what you’re comfortable with, you got to do what you think is right.”
I would hope that the home team can retain the majority. And I would also hope that if the home team retains the majority, that they’ll actually do something productive with it. Over the last year and a half, I suspect if we look back at what they’ve done with the majority, I don’t know that anybody in here could name more than one piece of legislation they’ve passed.
And no matter how big and beautiful it was, there’s a whole lot more that they’ve left on the table. And that, to me, is disappointing – to have a majority that doesn’t do anything with it.
Trying to go to 7-0 I think is extremely risky from a political standpoint. I think at best you’re going to get 6-1 and you may even go 5-2. I’ve told the press a number of times, I think if you get cute with this, you could end up in a 5-2 scenario. I don’t want to go 5-2.
I don’t want [Democratic House minority leader] Hakeem Jeffries as the speaker of the House. I think the best chance that South Carolina has to prevent that from happening is with our current maps.
I cannot in good conscience surrender this authority that has been preserved to, for, and by the states, and merely take orders from those who are not in South Carolina …
I absolutely understand what the president’s concern is here. I understand what the president’s issue is here. I don’t disagree with that. But there are other concerns that we have to consider. Those concerns have not been considered at all with the proposal that we have. Those concerns affect South Carolina and South Carolinians. And it is up to us to consider those things.
We’ve been able to punch above our weight regardless of the administration, regardless of who the president is, regardless of who occupies the White House. South Carolina has been able to deliver not just for South Carolina, but for the country and the world.
We have had that influence. Doing this will absolutely diminish that influence. It just will. And everybody knows it. Everybody in here, everybody who’s familiar with the process, we understand what’s going to happen here …
The bigger issue here is i had never had the privilege of speaking with the president of the United States until last week. That changes the calculation.
South Carolina is in a tough spot here, curious how they navigate it.
In other words i had never had the privilege of speaking with the president of the United States until last week. Curious to see how this develops.
I would hope that the home team can retain the majority. Meanwhile south Carolina’s state senate majority leader offered a nuanced case for rejecting Trump’s redistricting.
I had never had the privilege of speaking with the president of the United States until last week. Meanwhile the president told me, he said: “Look, I hope you can help us out.” He said: “But I understand you got to do what you’re comfortable with,.
What stands out is i had never had the privilege of speaking with the president of the United States until last week. That is the part worth paying attention to.
On one hand i would hope that the home team can retain the majority. But at the same time south Carolina’s state senate majority leader offered a nuanced case for rejecting Trump’s redistricting.
Considering south Carolina’s state senate majority leader offered a nuanced case for rejecting Trump’s redistricting, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
The fact that i had never had the privilege of speaking with the president of the United States until last week really puts things into perspective.
The bigger issue here is the president told me, he said: “Look, I hope you can help us out.” He said: “But I understand you got to do what you’re comfortable with,. That changes the calculation.
What stands out is south Carolina’s state senate majority leader offered a nuanced case for rejecting Trump’s redistricting. That is the part worth paying attention to.